The Classical Public Administrative Theory - 1158 Words

CLASSICAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE THEORY Most twentieth century scholars in sociology and the science of administration consider the classical public administrative theory as the early form of organizational theory and accompanied by three main types of management: scientific, administration and bureaucracy. All of these management ideas are linked to different academics. `The scientific management was developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915); the American engineer in his â€Å"principals of scientific management† (1911) tried to improve the industrial capability by creating the concept of â€Å"one best way† idea. The base of the scientific management or Taylorism, as it is called suggests increasing the output by simplifying jobs, pay by performed tasks, and create the alliance between the worker and manager. Thus, the workmen are the secondary concern in F. Taylors (1911) scientific theory. They are adjusted to the job and not the other way around. Although some researchers say F. Tayler’s (1911) theory is ignorant, incorrect and frequently just nonsensical, still most of its concepts are important today, especially in the industrial sphere. The most well-known idea about administration belongs to Thomas Woodrow Wilson (1856-1924), the 28th president of United States and renowned â€Å"father of public administration†. In his 1887 essay â€Å"the study of administration† Wilson observed the European including particularly French and GermanShow MoreRelatedThe Field Of Public Administration Essay1275 Words   |  6 PagesThe field of Public Administration is undoubtedly one of the most vast study fields there is. It is said that public administration is closely related to Management in terms of public management theories. After all Public Administration is the perfect management of people in a more vast public setting.According to Nigro and Nigro in their book Modern Public Administration, Public Administration is a co-operative group effort in a public setting which works in collaboration with the executive, legislatureRead MoreClassical Management Theory And The Classical Theory1503 Words   |  7 PagesThe Classical Management Theory entered the business world in the early nineteenth century, with an emphasis on increasing worker productivity. Developed by Frederick Taylor, the classical theory of management advocated a scientific study of tasks and the workers responsible for them. It was the foundation of many modern management theories and it aimed to improve operations within an organization. The Classical Management Theory was broken into three schools of thinking: Scientific management, whichRead MoreManagement Administrative Theory1585 Words   |  7 PagesORGANIZATION ASSIGNMENT 1 Mary Parker Follett has been described by Schermerhorn et al. as an Administrative Theorist within the Classical approach to management. However, others have seen her as ahead of her time, and have even described her as thoroughly modern . What were Mary Parker Follett s main contributions to management thought and practice; how do they relate to classical management theory and practice and how are they relevant to managers in contemporary organisations? Ever sinceRead MorePublic Administration1077 Words   |  5 PagesMidterm Essay: Classical Organizational Theory Liberty University February 5, 2014 Midterm Essay: Classical Organizational Theory Classical Organizational Theory deals with the systematic processes necessary to make bureaucracy more efficient and effective. Name three scholars that are credited with the development of classical organization thought that most correctly fit into this definition of Classical Organizational Theory. What were the basic arguments articulated by each in their contributionsRead MoreExamples Of Neoclassical Organizational Theory909 Words   |  4 Pagesperspectives that moved away from the mechanistic views of classical organizational theory in which human beings act as different parts to that machine to an approach that attempts to account for internal and external environments. This multi-dimension approach is considered an intellectual merger of most prior schools of thought beginning with neoclassical. Neoclassical organizational theory, a modified version of the classical organizational theory was developed at the end of WWII through the 1950s asRead MorePamd501 Paper704 Words   |  3 PagesClassical Organizational Theory deals with the â€Å"systematic processes necessary to make bureaucracy more efficient and effective.† Name three scholars that are credited with the development of classical organization thought that most correctly fit into this definition of Classical Organizational Theory. What were the basic arguments articulated by each in their contributions to the development of Classical Organizational Theory? Classical organizational theory evolved during the first half of thisRead MorePublic Sector Organizational Theory ( Postmodernism )1630 Words   |  7 PagesPublic Sector Organizational Theory Introduction This essay compares and contrasts the â€Å"Classical† and â€Å"Human Relations† approaches to management. It focuses on how these approaches are similar and compatible and looks at their differences and incompatibilities. It then explores how systems theory and contingency theory can reconcile the incompatibilities between the approaches. The question of authority in public administration has historically been a tacit one framed in terms of the public administrationRead MoreFour Main Theorists Of The Classical Approach To Public Administration738 Words   |  3 PagesClassical Approach The classical approach to public administration was focused on finding the best way to perform and manage tasks. This classical approach to Public Administration is often associated with Weber, Wilson, Taylor, and Gulick. Under the classical approach was four areas of focus which was the Bureaucratic, Scientific, Administrative, and Managerial approach. Each area represented the four main theorists that the classical approach was associated with. Max Webers bureaucratic approachRead MoreThe Rise of the Factory System during the Industrial Revolution1245 Words   |  5 Pagestwentieth, with a flourish of management theories ranging from classical theories of management to the Japanese management model. The present day management theory is the outcome of the many interdisciplinary efforts of a wide range of people. The rise of the factory system during the Industrial Revolution in Europe, where mechanization or automation and mass production were the pillars of productivity, was the start of the modern day organization. Management theory was, however, slow to evolve. ThereRead MorePeter Fayol And Max Weber1437 Words   |  6 PagesEarly management theories adopted by such proponents as Henri Fayol, Mary Parker Follett and Max Weber are relevant in todays’ world. In this essay I am going to discuss about all three theorists and how their theories are still relevant for managers in the 21st century in meeting the challenges. In the classical approach to management there are three branches under it. They are, scientific management, administrative principles and bureaucratic organisation. Henry Fayol and Mary Parker Follett developed

Hunter Worth Case Study free essay sample

The purpose of performing a case study is to apply the knowledge from previous lessons learned in the area of managing proper communication. After taking the personal assessment of communication apprehension exercise, I learned that I like to speak in group or groups of people. Some of my weaker areas involve public speaking and meetings. These two areas are important to work on since management speaks inside and outside the organization. It is important learn to communicate effectively since it concerns the organization as a whole for whom we work for. Communication is the process of sharing information between two or more people, with intentions to motivate and influence behavior. Communication is not just about sending information; it is about how one receives it and how it is interpreted. In Business Management it is the purpose of management to be able to communicate effectively to direct everyone’s attention towards the organizations goals, values, vision, and to ensure that they are influenced to act and achieve theses goals. (Daft, 2012). To communicate effectively it is important understand the role of the sender/receiver and the channels that are being utilized. In management, managers have many choices in which they communicate and is important to utilize them all in the most effective manner. Effective communication may seem simple, but there are barriers such as language in high-low context cultures that managers need to pay special attention to. According to the Daft textbook, when communicating in cross-cultural environments one should keep their messages simple, select words with care, pay careful attention to nonverbal messages, speak slowly, and avoid shouting, since this may seem intimidating to the listener. The way we communicate today is derived from downward communication, so it is important that we learn how to interpret the messes being sent and develop good written and verbal skills. Summary of the Case Hunter-Worth, a New York-based multinational toy manufacturer developed a new interactive plush toy that was cuddly and high-tech that they planned to unveil at a toy expo in New York. Being confident the toy would generate good revenues since it was based off a major holiday motion picture that was expected to have great reviews, seemed to create a high level of interest from buyers at the expo. (Daft, 2012) Chuck Moore, national sales manager for Hunter-Worth, seemed excited, but had a sense of fear looming from the pre-order volume and could not shake off the sense of impending doom. (Daft, 2012) The problem Chuck was facing was from the Mexican subsidiary that manufactured the toy for Hunter-Worth could not seem to make the deadlines. The shipments were late, and the quantities ordered fell short and the demand for the toy during the Christmas season was creating more turmoil for Chuck since he was unable to get his hands on them. Chuck decided that he needed to send an e-mail to Vincent Ruiz, the plant manager about the situation to find out why the shipments were late, the status of their latest order, and a copy of their production schedule. Although, the response was received within the hour Chuck was irritated with the response that was delivered by Vincent’s secretary, stating that the, â€Å"Mexican plant would be shipping the order† that was already a week late and also said it would be there within ten days. This was not the response Chuck expected and was angered, and decided to compose an e-mail to Michael Sato, executive vice president for sales and marketing that expressed his concern over the availability of the toy that was on the verge of being a best selling toy during the season. Chuck then forwarded the message to his supervisor and Sato. As to his surprise he received a phone call from Vincent whom was angered by the message Chuck forwarded, asking why he had went over his head and said such things to his boss. It seemed that Michael forwarded the message to Hunter-Worth’s vice president of operations, which was then forwarded to the Mexican subsidiary’s president. (Daft, 2012) Even though Chuck was not apologetic, this all could have been avoided if Vincent would have responded to his e-mail instead of his secretary whom Vincent stated answers all his e-mail and figured if the was any urgency he would have called instead. Vincent assumed Chuck was not interested in hearing the problems that they were having with suppliers and that they did not take deadlines seriously north of the border he hung up without a response. Recommendations Even though Chuck seems disheartened and confused about things getting worse, he could have avoided this all in the first place by developing an effective form of communication channel. It is Chuck’s responsibility to gather all the information from within the organization and distribute that information to the ones that need it. The first thing Chuck should have done was set up a meeting either in person or a virtual meeting with the Mexican subsidiary and their management team to ensure that production demand and deadlines could be met. One good way of establishing a communication channel is by developing a virtual team, according to Derosa/Lepsinger, â€Å"the use of virtual teams better enables organizations the ability to leverage their employees’ without having to bring them together face-to-face. † (Derosa, 1970) (Lepsinger, 1970) By developing a team it would have enabled communication channels to be open between Chuck, Vincent, and Moore and any problems like the supply problems could have been discussed. Another suggestion would have saved Chuck all the confusion from the form of communication of e-mail being used was just call Vincent directly. E-mail may be a good form of communicating but there could be typos which may send the wrong message and confuse what is being said. Also if it is be delivered to one individual one must make sure that it is done on a personal network so it does not have the grapevine effect and everyone gets the message being conveyed. When Chuck composed his e-mail to Vincent he assumed it was going to be answered by Vincent and not his secretary who should have contacted Vincent directly about the message that was sent to him. Chuck assumed that Vincent was not replying in a manner that was expected from a manger and was angered and composed an e-mail that should have been done in a manner that was respectful and conveyed the direct concern of the situation. Instead the message went the wrong way and created confusion from miscommunication or was interpreted wrong due to cultural communication differences. Chuck should have reread his e-mail and ensured that his concerns were able to interpret the message by Mexican subsidiary by using a text translator and that it only addressed his concerns of why production demands were not being met. Conclusion By performing this case study it given me a better insight on communicating in multi-culture environment. After reading the article by De Forest, Thinking of a Plant in Mexico, it made me realize the communication barriers that create confusion among workers in Mexico. Their managers are not hands on so they communicate through other channels, their work environments are more of family environment not based on comfort where everyone works together as a whole. Communication channels there differ from here in America in Mexico they do not have the technologies we utilize to communicate effectively. I did not realize that there are so many things that we as managers need to address whether working in a multi-culture environment or in a global context. The ability to communicate, listen, and write effectively is an important concept of learning as we develop our selves into good leaders within any organization. We must be able to motivate employees through proper communication channels, and be able to communicate honestly and develop and use formal communication channels. According to the Daft textbook, we should utilize teams, task forces, project managers, and facilitate a plan for crisis communication, this way we can avoid problems that surfaced in the Hunter-Worth case study. (Daft,2012) References